![]() This would have put immense strain on the characters, so looking decades older than they were wouldn’t too difficult to believe. While there was a temporary peace, the characters had been through the First Wizard War. Let’s not deny that the world of Harry Potter was a difficult one. The wizarding wars would have aged people Harry Potter continues to inspire generations – including Jack Harlow.Show off your Wizard’s Chess skills with this Harry Potter set that’s now over half off.Can Fantastic Beasts hold up to the Harry Potter franchise?. ![]() ![]() Create a magical event worthy of Hogwarts with this new Harry Potter-themed party planning book.Tom Felton is the star of the new Harry Potter x CASETiFY collection.However, there may be arguments for the aging. While actors playing roles younger or older than them isn’t unheard of, the characters looked older than they should have been. They were all actors in their 40s and 50s, playing characters in their 30s. But looking back, is it possible that the actors were actually too old for the characters? Did the movies forget the timeline for the sake of having well-known actors in the important roles? Gary Oldman and David Thewlis also became Sirius and Lupin, bringing the characters to life. ![]() There’s no way we could even imagine someone else playing that role. We all love Alan Rickman’s Snape in the Harry Potter movies. Alan Rickman, Gary Oldman, and David Thewlis were amazing as Snape, Sirius, and Lupin, but were they actually too old for the Harry Potter characters? Should the movies have cast someone young for each role?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |